Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vilius Gaubas vs Zura Tkemaladze Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaubas vs Tkemaladze analysis and find out who is favored!
Vilius Gaubas vs Zura Tkemaladze Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gaubas 1 - 0 Tkemaladze
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaubas has won 48.57% of points on his second serve, while Tkemaladze has won 47.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaubas, in recent form, has won 52.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tkemaladze has won 53.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.79% and 33.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaubas has saved 56.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tkemaladze has saved 51.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaubas has won 66.27% of matches played (W/L 55/ 28), with Tkemaladze winning 49.21% (W/L 31/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaubas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 92/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Tkemaladze has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 74/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaubas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.15% of matches (W/L 37/ 15), where as Tkemaladze has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 30/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gaubas winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gaubas winning 2 and Tkemaladze winning 0. The last match between Gaubas and Tkemaladze was at the Davis Cup, Group I, PO, LTU-GEO 3-2, 04-02-2024, Rubber 5, I.hard with Vilius Gaubas getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gaubas and Tkemaladze have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gaubas winning 0 times and Tkemaladze 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gaubas winning 0, and Tkemaladze 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaubas has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.6 while Tkemaladze has played against players with an average rank of 110.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaubas has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tkemaladze has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaubas has converted 45.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tkemaladze has converted 39.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
283
Rank
283
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
743
Rank
633
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
63% (107-63)
Career Total W/L
47% (104-119)
67% (26-13)
YTD W/L
43% (9-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gaubas VS Tkemaladze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Vilius Gaubas | Zura Tkemaladze |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gaubas VS Tkemaladze H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vilius Gaubas | Zura Tkemaladze |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (26/13) | 43% (9/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (55/35) | 44% (22/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (464/400) | 46% (206/245) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 50% (9/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (20/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 93 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:59 | 1:46:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 318.82 | 84.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1658/2554) | 67% (898/1333) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1116/1658) | 60% (542/898) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (436/896) | 48% (210/435) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (131/293) | 39% (59/150) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1164/2724) | 40% (543/1356) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (14/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (11/4) | 47% (9/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (26/39) | 40% (8/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (9/12) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (18/6) | 0% (11/0) |
Vilius Gaubas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Vilius Gaubas
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Vilius Gaubas
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
23 of
55)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Vilius Gaubas
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Hugo Dellien
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Matteo Martineau
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zura Tkemaladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Vadym Ursu
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
49%
(
44 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Millen Hurrion
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
56
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaubas Vs Tkemaladze Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Vilius Gaubas
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Zura Tkemaladze
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
